To:
Home
Office
OIG
(re US-VISIT)
IDABC
(re OSCIE)
China
(re Golden Shield)
Pakistan
(re NADRA)
FBI
(re NGI)
UIDAI
(re Aadhaar)
Agencies
India's ID card scheme drowning in a sea of false
positives
15 March 2011
"The logo for Aadhaar,
a sun in red and yellow,
with a
fingerprint traced across its centre
... a new dawn of equal
opportunity
for each individual"
The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI [1]) promised that they will register all the billion+ residents of India and issue
them with ID cards. They promised that each identity recorded on the population
register will be unique. And they promised that uniqueness can be proved by
reference to people s biometrics only.
After making those three promises, UIDAI tested the biometric technology
they depend on for Aadhaar [2], the Indian ID
card scheme. The results of their proof of
concept trial are available for all to see in their UID Enrolment Proof-of-Concept Report,
published in December 2010.
Allegation:
UIDAI s own figures in the
proof of concept trial report demonstrate ineluctably that the one thing the
unique identification authority will not be able to guarantee is unique
identification. Aadhaar will drown in a sea of false positives. The whole house
of Aadhaar cards could collapse [3] and its putative benefits
never be delivered. In particular, the poor of India could go from having no official identity papers to having useless official identity papers.
Everyone else, of course, already has plenty of official ID and doesn t need an
Aadhaar card in addition.
A. If that allegation is right, then UIDAI need to make it clear that
their promises as to unique identification were based on representations made to
them by the world biometrics industry. It is the biometrics industry which needs
to explain the mathematically inevitable failure of Aadhaar to deliver unique
identification, and not the blameless UIDAI.
B. Otherwise, the author of this allegation is a bumbling fool whom
no-one need take seriously.
Which is it? A or B?
You be the judge:
http://dematerialisedid.com/BCSL/Drown.html
[1] According to the UIDAI website: The existing patchwork of multiple databases in India provides scope to individuals to furnish different personal information to different agencies ... The UIDAI has been setup by the Government of India with a mandate to issue a unique identification number to all the residents in the country. A key requirement of the Aadhaar is to minimize/eliminate duplicate identity to improve the efficacy of the service delivery. Biometrics features are selected to be the primary mechanism for ensuring uniqueness ... . UIDAI s mission is: To design biometrics system that enables India to achieve uniqueness in the national registry .
[2] Aadhaar is the
brand name for India s ID card scheme. The word Aadhaar occurs in several Indian languages and
denotes a support or foundation or base. Something which can be confidently
trusted, which is dependable, on which the weight of expectations can safely be
placed.
[3] There is a precedent. The UK ID card
scheme was cancelled with nothing to show for eight years effort by
politicians, the Home Office and the Cabinet Office. One reason for that failure
is the credulity with which claims for the reliability
of biometrics are treated. India will want to avoid the UK s undignified
fate:
Damian
Green MP feeding disk drives
from the failed UK ID card scheme
and the
credibility of the Home Office
into an industrial shredder
Photograph: SA Mathieson/Guardian
About
Business Consultancy Services Ltd (BCSL):
BCSL
has operated as an IT consultancy since 1984. The past 8 years have been
spent campaigning against the Home Office's plans to introduce
government ID cards into the UK. It must now be admitted that
the Labour government 1997-2010 were much better at convincing people
that these plans are a bad idea than anyone
else, including BCSL.
Press
contacts: David Moss, BCSL@blueyonder.co.uk